Here we present the proof of assertions 3. and 4. of the following proposition. The proofs of 1. and 2. will be presented in class and here they are assumed. The proofs presented here will not be presented in class.
Proposition 3.1.4 (Calculus of Limits)
Suppose that and
are two functions
, and that for some
we have
, and
.
for some . Then
-
.
- If
,
.
.
- If
,
.
- If
, and
then
.
Proof of 3: For a constant function, [Example 3.1.3 (2)]. By 1.
, and
Now, let . Then there is a
and a
such that,
whenever
, and
whenever
Choose . If
we then get,
Now
By the Sum Rule (1.):
.
The last line guaranteed by 2.
Proof of 4: Let , and assume that
. Set
and
By hypothesis there are and
such that
and
By the reverse triangle inequality we have
and so if then
, and hence
(
)
Define , so in particular
. Now
Thus if , then the inequalities (
) and (
) hold so
and
So finally, we have
as required.
The case where is done by setting
and
and following the same steps (and is left as an exercise)
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 23, 2011 at 2:08 pm
Jason Fealy
just wondering if there are more marks going for question one than the other questions in ms2001 summer exam?
May 23, 2011 at 4:54 pm
J.P. McCarthy
Jason,
Embarrassingly enough I can’t remember. I’m under the impression that the split is equal 25-25-25 but I can’t get access to the marking scheme until the morning — it’s kept under lock and key. I will get back to you then.
J.P.
May 24, 2011 at 10:41 am
J.P. McCarthy
Jason,
All questions carry equal marks.
J.P.
October 5, 2011 at 9:29 am
MS 2001: Week 3 « J.P. McCarthy: Math Page
[…] covered from Proposition 1.4.3 to Proposition 2.1.5 inclusive. Here are the proofs of the product and quotient rules for the calculus of […]