This sandbox is going to take from a variety of sources, mostly Shuzhou Wang.
C*-Ideals
Let be a closed (two-sided) ideal in a non-commutative unital
-algebra
. Such an ideal is self-adjoint and so a non-commutative
-algebra
. The quotient map is given by
,
, where
is the equivalence class of
under the equivalence relation:
.
Where we have the product
,
and the norm is given by:
,
the quotient is a
-algebra.
Consider now elements and
. Consider
.
The tensor product . Now note that
,
by the nature of the Tensor Product (). Therefore
.
Definition
A WC*-ideal (W for Woronowicz) is a C*-ideal such that
, where
is the quotient map
.
Let be the algebra of functions on a classical group
. Let
. Let
be the set of functions which vanish on
: this is a C*-ideal. The kernal of
is
.
Let so that
. Note that
and so
.
Note that if
. It is not possible that both
and
are in
: if they were
, but
, which is not in
by assumption. Therefore one of
or
is equal to zero and so:
,
and so by linearity, if vanishes on a subgroup
,
.
In this way, WC*-ideals generalise functions which vanish on distinguished subgroups. In fact, without checking all the details, I imagine that first isomorphism theorem can show that . Let
be the ring homomorphism
.
Then ,
, and so we have the isomorphism of rings, which presumably carries forward to the algebras of functions level…
A WC*-subalgebra of is a W Hopf C*-algebra
together with an injective morphism of WC*-algebras
. Such a morphism is a C*-morphism
such that
.
Note this is a different beast to the surjective C*-morphism I have previously seen.
Note that (
) and
(with
, and
) are trivial WC*-subalgebras of
.
Note that in the finite classical case, the set of functions vanishing on a proper subgroup has the property that:
, and
That vanishes on
implies that
. Could
? Of course not — because then
would not be closed under inverses. Similarly
, and so
for any
. From above we know that if
, that for all
, either
or
is not an element of
, that is either
or
vanishes on
. This implies that
.
This makes a Hopf ideal.
Wang remarks that if the algebra of functions is finite, say , and
a WC*-ideal, that
and
(but makes no claim to the above).
There is a slight error if the ideal is not proper. If the ideal is the whole of , then
does not hold. Assume therefore that
is a proper ideal. For
, a linear map between finite vector spaces with kernel
:
.
Let . As
, either
or
. We know that
, so that, using the antipodal property:
.
If , then
, implying
. Therefore we have that
if
is proper.
I am unable to show the stability of under
, and have farmed this question out to MO (where it has been answered: using the below we have
).
First Isomorphism Theorem
-
The quotient of a WC*-algebra by a WC*-ideal has a unique WC*-algebra structure such that the quotient map is a morphism of WC*-algebras.
-
For every morphism
of WC*-algebras. the kernel is a WC*-ideal. The image of
is a WC*-algebra isomorphic to
(as defined above). Furthermore this image is a WC*-subalgebra of
.
-
Let
be the morphism from above. If
(should this be an (closed) ideal?), then there is a unique morphism of WC*-algebras
, such that
, where
is the quotient map
.
What does this look like classically?
1.Well first of all if the ideal is the full ideal then we are talking about the algebra of functions on the trivial group. So let us suppose that the ideal is proper. Ideals cannot contain invertible elements. This means that only functions with roots are in the ideal. Let be the set of roots of
. Let
be two elements in an ideal. Then
has roots at
. Note further that this cannot be non-empty, for it it is, then
is invertible.
Therefore
,
is non-empty and is a subset of such that every element of
vanishes on it.
Next question: is a group? The answer is yes. Let
and
. Using
, and
, we know that for all
,
, either
or
is in
. Therefore
,
and either or
is equal to zero. Therefore
, and so
is closed under multiplication. Is
?
Because is finite, every element
has finite order, a least number
such that
. Therefore
. We have shown that
is closed under multiplication and so the result follows. Unfortunately this very “set of points” argument does not transfer easily to the quantum case.
Now presumably in this commutative case, we have
.
This follows from the map above.
2. To show this we probably have to show that a morphism of algebras on finite groups corresponds to a group homomorphism. I would suggest that every morphism is of the form
for
… I have spent some time now on this problem and perhaps it is a waste of time. I have shown if
is the pullback of a group homomorphism, then
,
and I am certain this is a morphism of quantum groups. On the other hand I have shown that if is a morphism of classical
, that with respect to the basis of delta functions, for all
and I am confident this will yield that is the pushback of a group homomorphism, but I am perhaps wasting my time. Let us move onto the proof of the quantum result.
Proof: 1. Let be the quotient
. Define
,
where . This is well defined. For if
,
and
,
because , and it follows that
is well defined.
Wang claims that is generated by
.
2. Let . Define a C*-isomorphism
by
,
that is . Under this isomorphism
identifies with
.
Let us make a commutative diagram for all this:
Is a WC*-ideal? Well
.
We know that which implies
, and so
is a WC*-ideal.
It turns out that is an isomorphism of WC*-algebras from
onto
, and
,
and so is a WC*-subalgebra of
under the natural injection
The following took me a little by surprise:
Proposition
Let be a compact group. We have the correspondences:
, subgroups
, WC*-ideals
with
, WC*-subalgebras.
OK… a WC*subalgebra is an injective WC*-morphism. I am fairly sure that the map in question, in the classical case, is simply . I am reasonably confident that this is the case. Writing it down seems to be a little awkward.
Definition
A compact quantum is called a Wang subgroup of
if there is a WC*-ideal
of
,
, such that:
If there is a surjective morphism ,
is called embedded.
Let be Wang subgroup of a compact quantum group. This means there is a WC*-ideal
such that
. Let
be the quotient map.
is said to be normal if for every irreducible representation
of
, with matrix
, the multiplicity of the trivial representation of
;
, in the representation
is either zero or the dimension of
.
Hopefully someone here can help me with how this is a classical result.
Let be the right quotient space, defined by Podlés:
,
This is a compact quantum group, the right quotient of
by
. We also have a right quotient
which is, in general, different to the right quotient. The full quantum group
is normal in
, and if the counit is bounded, so is the trivial group.
Normal Quantum Subgroups
Let be a quantum subgroup of a quantum group with surjection
,
.
is closed but this is not important at this moment.
What follows can also be done for right quotient spaces.
Define the left quotient
.
These are functions constant on left cosets of . Define
.
These are smooth functions constant on left cosets of . Define
.
This map is a projection of norm one (completely positive and completely bounded conditional expectation) from onto the the continuous functions on the right cosets.
Classically it maps a function on to a function on
. The value that
takes on
is the average over
.
We have that and this algebra is dense in
.
Proposition
Let be a subgroup of
. The following are equivalent.
is an (injective) WC*-subalgebra of
.
- same for the right quotient
- the right and left quotient spaces are equal
- for every irreducible
with matrix
has
equal to zero or
.
Before we tackle the proof, we must look at the Podlés results that the conditional expectation satisfies
(*)
If we can believe this we have for , as
:
.
If we write down (*) as applied to the matrix element of an irreducible representation, , we find that it is actually rather trivial, and essentially due to the identities doing nothing on certain factors. In fact both are equal to:
.
Proof: (3) ($) In general
,
and similar for the left quotient. Letting , we have
.
Let be the multiplicity of the trivial representation of
in
. It is either
or zero as shown (more or less) here.
I am going to leave the rest of the proof and move on
Definition
A quantum subgroup of a CQG
is said to be normal if it satisfies the any of the equivalent conditions of the preceding proposition.
There is another condition given above about the multiplicity of the trivial representation… it is equivalent to condition (4).
The following seems a generalisation of the fact that every subgroup of an abelian group is normal.
Proposition
Let . Let
be a quantum subgroup of
with surjection
. Then
is normal, where
is the embedding of
in
,
is discrete, and
. Moreover
where
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
January 16, 2020 at 12:13 pm
Freslon’s Ergodic Theorem for (Finite) Group Algebras | J.P. McCarthy: Math Page
[…] Well… I have an inkling that because dual groups satisfy what I would call the condition of abelianness (under the ‘quantisation’ functor), all (quantum) subgroups are normal… this is probably an obvious thing to write down (although I must search the literature) to ensure it is indeed known (or is untrue?). Edit: Wang had it already, see the last proposition here. […]