In the case of a finite classical group , we can show that if we have i.i.d. random variables
, that if
, for
a coset of a proper normal subgroup
, that the random walk on
driven by
, the random variables:
,
exhibits a periodicity because
.
This shows that a necessary condition for ergodicity of a random walk on a finite classical group driven by
is that the support of
not be concentrated on the coset of a proper normal subgroup.
I had hoped that something similar might hold for the case of random walks on finite quantum groups but alas I think I have found a barrier.
Let be a proper normal subgroup so that
is a finite group. Consider the pure state
. In the classical case, the convolution of pure states remains pure. This is because for a finite group
, the pure states are precisely the delta measures and the convolution of delta measures is a delta measure again:
.
In particular convolution powers of pure states remain pure.
The algebra is a subalgebra of
consisting of functions constant on cosets. Suppose
is concentrated on a coset
. Then its support projection
is less than the support projection of
:
.
In the classical case, we have that:
.
Presumably this is a special case of, for states ,
.
What we are looking at here is which is not pure being comparable to
which is pure. The state
isn’t pure but it’s support is less than the support of a pure state on
and so not ergodic.
An obvious candidate for a probability on a finite quantum group to be concentrated on the coset of a proper normal quantum subgroup
… well what should be the analogue of
for a quantum quotient group?
Something that comes to mind is that a pure state on would correspond to
. Alternatively
might be a minimal projection in the algebra of functions.
At any rate, we would want the convolution of pure states to remain pure. However this is not true in general in the quantum case.
Take the algebra of functions on a quantum group given by:
.
This has algebra:
.
Consider the pure state concentrated on the
factor, say as simple as
.
Then the pure state is no longer concentrated on a single summand but rather across the factors
,
,
.
This means that is not pure.
While it may be the case that for any state such that
and
,
we can no longer say that is pure and so cannot know that
.
Presumably it is possible to find a quantum group such that
is a quotient of
by a normal quantum subgroup
so that
,
and a subspace of
.
Now take an element of such that
.
Because is pure, classically we know that
is not ergodic. We cannot be sure of this now in the quantum case.
We cannot argue that cannot be the whole of
.
Leave a comment
Comments feed for this article