You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘MATH6037’ category.
Remarks in italics are by me for extra explanation. These comments would not be necessary for full marks in an exam situation. Exercises taken from p.48 of these notes.
Question 1
(i)
Multiplying the first and last coefficients: . Now the factors of
are
. So I want to rewrite the middle term
in terms of these:
(ii)
Taking out the common factor :
.
(iii)
Multiplying the first and last coefficients: . The factors of
are
. I want to rewrite the middle term
in terms of one of these factors:
.
Remarks in italics are by me for extra explanation. These comments would not be necessary for full marks in an exam situation. Exercises taken from p.35 of https://jpmccarthymaths.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/math6037-general-information/
These questions all require integration by parts although they don’t explicitly say so.
Question 1
We must choose a and
— where we choose
according to the LIATE rule. Here there are no logs, no inverses but there is an algebraic (sum of powers of
). Hence let
,
(find
by integrating:
):
; and
.
Hence by the integration by parts formula:
We check our solution by differentiating (using the product rule):
,
as required.
Remarks in italics are by me for extra explanation. These comments would not be necessary for full marks in an exam situation. Exercises taken from https://jpmccarthymaths.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/math6037-general-information/
Question 1
(a)
Now:
and
,
hence:
(b)
There is no obvious anti-derivative and there is no obvious manipulation hence we are looking for the function-dervative pattern to make a substitution (or else use the LIATE rule). Notice that the top is the derivative of the bottom. Hence we will let be the function; i.e. the bottom:
Let :
Now put everything back into the integrand, suppressing the limits:
Now, what do we have to raise to, to get
? i.e.
; well
. Hence
:
.
Module Description:
More detailed General Information on this module (* not all one hundred percent accurate at time of publication) may be found after the table of contents in this set of incomplete notes:
(last updated 04 May. )
MATH6037 please skip to the end of this entry.
The sum, product and quotient rules show us how to differentiate a great many different functions from the reals to the reals. However some functions, such as are a composition of functions, and these rules don’t tell us what the derivative of
is. There is, however, a theorem called the chain rule that tells us how to differentiate these functions. Here we present the proof. In class we won’t prove this assertion but we will make one attempt to explain why it takes the form it does. In general only practise can make you proficient in the use of the chain rule. See http://euclid.ucc.ie/pages/staff/wills/teaching/ms2001/exercise3.pdf or any other textbook (such as a LC text book) with exercises.
Proposition 4.1.8 (Chain Rule)
Let be functions, and let
denote the composition
(that is
for each
). If
such that
is differentiable at
and
is differentiable at
, then
is differentiable at
with

Recent Comments